Send the magazine to someone who'd like to see Washington State as it's never been seen before
Current Issue
Past Issues - Review sample articles from past issues of Washington State Magazine
Photo Galleries - View photos of Washington's people and places--and more
Web Exclusives - Read exclusive features only available on the website
Buy books by WSU faculty and alumni.
Read reviews of books by faculty and alumns.
Class Notes - Stay up-to-date with fellow alumni and leave your own messages and announcements.
Make a tax-deductible gift to the Washington State Magazine Excellence Fund.
The latest word on WSU research.
Advertise to our 130,000 readers in Washington, the West and throughout the nation.
Let us know what you think.
Send address or personal info change.
Get Washington State Magazine at home.
Send the magazine to someone who'd like to see Washington State as it's never been seen before
 
Page 1 2 3
   
  Zoology 61: Teaching eugenics at WSU      

 

by Stephen Jones

In the end it just ended. No arguments, no intellectual battles among faculty, no acknowledgement of racial hygiene programs. At Washington State College at least, there just weren’t enough students who wanted to take Zoology 61, Eugenics. By the beginning of 1950, only six students had pre-enrolled in the course for the following school year, down from 12 the year before. In a memo to the faculty on January 17, 1950, the instructor, Professor Ray Moree, stated, “Enrollment in Zool. 61, Human Heredity and Eugenics is not sufficiently high to justify its continuation; it is believed this course can be replaced by a new one which will meet the needs of a larger number of students.” The staff of the Department of Zoology met one week later. Item number 2 on the agenda was Zoology 61. The only record was “Motion Farner, second McNeil. Discontinue Zool. 61. Carried by staff.” And that was it. After 30 years, the faculty had dropped course number 61.

Eugenics tree

Eugenics, the study of improving the human race, was named and formalized as a science in 1883 England by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. By the early 1900s the United States had taken the lead in research, teaching, and funding for the new field. Germany took over that role in the early 1930s.

The first U.S. scientists to accept eugenics were the plant and animal breeders at the land-grant universities and in the United States Department of Agriculture. It seemed only natural to apply the “science,” which had met so much success in the planned breeding of farm crops and barn animals, to humans. The result was one of the most tragic episodes in modern science.

Membership in eugenic societies included university presidents, congressmen, philanthropists, representatives of research institutions and insurance companies, clergymen, journalists, physicians, social workers, and scientists.

American eugenicists were united by the idea that the human race--or at least the white, northern European, and affluent part of it—was degenerating because inferior people were breeding more quickly than those who were “well born,” and that these inferior types were intermingling with the chosen classes and races.

These beliefs were presented in posters at county and state agricultural fairs that read, “Some people are born to be a burden to themselves and to the rest of society. The American Eugenic Society aims to eliminate hereditary degeneracy from future generations of the human family by eugenical sterilization, segregation, and other measures.”

By the 1930s, sterilization, segregation, and “other measures” were carried out for eugenic purposes in the United States with complete openness.

Around 60,000 forced eugenic sterilizations had been performed at U.S. hospitals, asylums, schools, and other institutions by the 1950s. Washington was the second state in the country to legalize forced sterilizations. More than 700 were sterilized here. Nationwide, more than 65 percent of those sterilized were women. The legal test case for these sterilizations was Buck v. Bell, which was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927. Carrie Buck, age 17, was sent to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded in Lynchburg, Virginia, in 1924. Her mother, Emma, had been at the same institution since 1920. Carrie had just delivered a baby that had resulted from a rape. IQ tests showed her mental age to be nine, and that of her mother to be eight. Carrie’s sterilization was ordered soon after her arrival at the colony and was immediately challenged by her court-appointed guardian. A Red Cross worker examined Carrie’s eight-month-old baby, Vivian, and testified that she was below normal intelligence for a child her age. Experts from the Eugenics Record Office then testified that the feeblemindedness that they witnessed in the family was definitely heritable and warranted sterilization.

The state’s case for sterilization was upheld by the Federal Supreme Court by an 8 to 1 vote. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. summed up the feeling of the court with, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Carrie Buck and more than 1,000 other residents of the colony were sterilized in the decade following the ruling. Stephen J. Gould noted that in the end, contrary to the opinions of the eugenic experts, there was no feeblemindedness among the three generations of Bucks. In later years, in fact, Vivian made the honor roll in high school.


Page 1 2 3

Continued