 Robert Wielgus and his research team combine fieldwork and mathematics
to study cougars, black bears, grizzly bears, and lynx. As with work by
student Hilary Cooley, their work often overturns
common assumptions
about carnivore behavior and population size. Photo by Robert Hubner.
Robert Wielgus has studied grizzly bears in Idaho, cougars in
British Columbia, and lynx in Washington. So when the Washington
State University expert on large carnivores took a sabbatical two
years ago, of course he went to . . . Paris.
Wielgus went to France to help restore grizzly bears to the
Pyrenees Mountains. It was a project made to order for Wielgus, who
began his career as a field ecologist but who now uses math to gain
insight into carnivore behavior.
"I do field work here all the time," Wielgus says. "Then I go
there and just immerse myself in mathematics. I've worked with them
[the French] for a long period of time, and together we do amazing
things."
Along with colleagues at Paris's Mathematical Eco-Evolutionary
Theory Group, Wielgus helped persuade the French government to
transplant five grizzlies from Slovakia to an area in the western
Pyrenees where the native bears have suffered high mortality in
recent years.
Grizzlies, called brown bears in Europe, still roam the
mountains along the border between France and Spain, but their
numbers plummeted from about 200 a century ago to five in 1995. The
addition of three Slovakian bears in 1997 stabilized the grizzly
population in the central Pyrenees. A separate population in the
western part of the range, however, has continued to struggle.
In 2004, French authorities wanted to know whether it would be
worthwhile to bring in more foreign bears. If the habitat wouldn't
support them, or if human-caused mortality was just too high in
that area, there was no point putting money and effort into another
transplantation.
Wielgus's analysis showed that neither habitat nor humanity was
the problem. The problem was not enough bears, and especially not
enough lady bears.
In a small population like the one in the western Pyrenees, says
Wielgus, the strongest males hoard females. One big boar might lord
it over three sows, breeding with each in successive years. His
territory becomes home to cubs of various ages as well as their
mothers. It's a sprawling, relatively peaceful family.
But if the patriarch dies, other males try to take over his
realm. Disaster ensues. A female caring for cubs won't mate, and
since the new males have no interest in becoming foster dads,
getting rid of the cubs becomes job one. The formal name for this
behavior is sexually selected infanticide.
"They don't even eat these cubs," says Wielgus. "Just kill 'em,
shake 'em, and throw 'em away. They're not doing it for the food
value."
They're doing it to get a faster start on a family of their own.
When a female loses her cubs, she comes into heat again quickly.
That clearly benefits the new male, but the population as a whole
suffers. Not only are the cubs lost, but the females often become
so stressed that their productivity drops. Sow bears in the western
Pyrenees average just one cub every three years. At that rate, says
Wielgus, the population is doomed.
The way to recovery for these bears is to boost their overall
numbers, particularly the number of females. In larger groups, with
plenty of females to go around, the males become downright
easygoing.
"Everyone just copulates with everyone," he says. There are too
many male neighbors to defend against; and since none of the males
knows which of them fathered which cubs, they leave all the
youngsters alone.
Wielgus was one of the first biologists to discover sexually
selected infanticide in bears. His work in the northern Rockies in
the 1990s helped overturn the long-held belief that trophy hunting
helps carnivore populations by removing surplus males and giving
females and cubs greater access to resources. Wielgus showed that
removing large males has just the opposite effect.
"Every time you kill a big male, you whack the kids of [up to]
three females," he says. In fact, the sexually selected infanticide
that results when large males are removed can damage populations
enough to drive them to extinction.
Wielgus and his Parisian colleagues used a mathematical model
called a Monte Carlo simulation to predict what would happen with
the Pyrenees grizzlies over the next 30 years if different numbers
of bears were added. They found that bringing in at least seven
bears, six of them female, by 2007, would likely secure the group's
future.
The French government's decision to bring in five female bears
in 2006 is a big step toward recovery, Wielgus says. He and his
colleagues will continue to press for more bears to be added, to
further boost the population's chances for survival.
In the meantime, says Wielgus, the project gives students in his
quantitative ecology class a whole new perspective on a subject
that can seem abstract and dry compared to the big, fierce beasts
they're excited about. "This is an example for my students, that
this isn't just a bunch of esoteric theoretical mathematics," he
says.
"Basically, this is mathematics saving species."
Washington State Magazine Home
|